<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michel Hiemstra - Web Development &#38; Internet Marketing &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitterâ€™s Little Known SEO Value</title>
		<link>http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/twitter%e2%80%99s-little-known-seo-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/twitter%e2%80%99s-little-known-seo-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michel Hiemstra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For too many, SEO is synonymous with ranking on the first SERP page in Google. For too many, optimizing a site for Google means getting links, many links, no matter what. Defining and redefining SEO will not change the way these people perceive it. This is not an article for them. Those webmasters who optimize <a href="http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/twitter%e2%80%99s-little-known-seo-value/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For too many, SEO is synonymous with ranking on the first SERP page in Google. For too many, optimizing a site for Google means getting links, many links, no matter what. Defining and redefining SEO will not change the way these people perceive it. This is not an article for them. Those webmasters who optimize solely for Google are basically targeting only 70% of the search engine market, and disregarding the rest.</p>
<p><span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-27 alignleft" title="twitter-logo" src="http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twitter-logo.png" alt="twitter-logo" width="193" height="108" />This is an article for those who need to learn something new, and want to use all possible SEO channels to drive more traffic and to gain more customers. This article will prove what â€œrealâ€ SEO value is to be expected from services like <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>.</p>
<h5>Does twitter Pass Any Link Juice?</h5>
<p>Since Twitter started gaining popularity the question about its â€œSEO valueâ€ has been on the minds of many webmasters who obviously want to boost their placement into Googleâ€™s SERPs. But using Twitter for â€œlink juiceâ€ is a lost battle in Googleâ€™s ranking methodology.</p>
<p>Twitter adds a <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=96569">â€œnofollowâ€</a> attribute to links submitted by its users. The â€œnofollowâ€ attribute advises Google, and a few other search engines, to ignore the link. Some of these follow the links but exclude them from their ranking calculations (Yahoo!, Google); some ignore the links completely (MSN). The only known search engine that doesnâ€™t comply with Googleâ€™s â€œnofollowâ€ at all is <a href="http://www.ask.com/">Ask.com</a>. This example alone shows that Googleâ€™s algorithms are not the gospel for all search engines.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-28" title="compete-november-2008" src="http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/compete-november-2008.gif" alt="compete-november-2008" width="482" height="407" /></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/23/november-search-share-google-yahoo-msn-live-ask-aol/">According to compete.com</a>, Ask.com owns about 2.5% of the search engine market share. The same source shows that in November 2008 there were 255 million search queries on Ask.com. This is nothing compared to 7235 millions on Google, but can you seriously disregard a source of such traffic? Ask.com is a potential gate for visitors that could convert into customers.</p>
<p>So letâ€™s ask the question again, shall we? Does Twitter pass any link juice? For Ask.com it does.</p>
<h5>Do tinyURL Shortened URLs Have SEO Value?</h5>
<p>The short answer is yes. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/">TinyURLs</a> are dynamically created URLs that redirect users to the real URL via 301 (permanent redirect). Search engines do not index TinyURLs, but index and pass PageRank to the actual URLs instead. The problem with Twitter, as we already discussed, is the â€œnofollowâ€ attribute added to all submitted links.</p>
<h5>Are There Any Other Possible SEO Advantages with Twitter?</h5>
<p>As I already said, SEO is not only about building links. Optimizing a site is about creating and promoting content that can be regarded as a resource. â€œCreatingâ€ is â€œonsite SEO.â€ â€œPromotingâ€ is â€œoffsite SEO.â€</p>
<p>Every time you submit your site to a directory you â€œpromote itâ€ â€“ meaning that you do â€œoffsite SEO.â€ Every time a link to your site is published somewhere on the web a gate to your site is being opened. People donâ€™t care about â€œnofollowâ€ attributes. If they see a link and they think the content it leads to is interesting, they follow.</p>
<p>When visitors land on a page from an exterior link some other metrics are affected: number of unique visitors, number of page views, and time on site. These metrics matter for the search engines more and more; since all other variables are so easily gamed (links and keywords are all subject to spam and black hat SEO strategies).</p>
<p>To make a long story short: although Twitter is a social media tool meant to create community and relationships, it does have an SEO value. For example, Twitter can affect positively your Alexa rankings by sending visitors to your pages. Usage data is a sign of quality for Google and all the other search engines.<strong> If you can make people come to your site via Twitter, then this is an SEO advantage you cannot afford to miss. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/01/15/twitter-seo/" target="_blank">source</a>, by Mihaela Lica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michelhiemstra.nl/blog/twitter%e2%80%99s-little-known-seo-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

